Man is weird. He goes on discovering and inventing and explaining everything he finds around him, thinking he's cracked the code. Perhaps that makes him feel he is the ruler of our planet, and perhaps justifies the methods and procedures he applies in order to rule.
Firstly man does not rule earth. The greater reality is human population, has been conveniently segmented by anthropological specifics, geographical specifics (determined by man himself), at any arbirtrary point of time, religions, political beliefs etc. These segments are essentially pockets of heterogeneous communities living in varieties of flatlands, lowlands, mountains, deserts, ravines, riverbanks. We have modified them according to our convenience. We
call them cities, towns, villages, islands...28% of earth space has been accessible to man. But still man rules the planet!
Man thinks he has cracked the code.
Most explanations are quantifications. In order to "understand" Nature, is quantification the correct way? to know the relevance of a creation in the backdrop of an ever-expanding infinite universe. Was it created to show the characteristics man finds in it, or is there a different perspective to ponder over it that might take us to a new locus of Knowledge, which explains it to its conclusion? Would that open a new door to the domain of 'Absolute Knowledge'?
We claim to understand things through a restricted approach which leads to array of information that we can understand.
Perhaps not...
Dr.Anirban Chaudhuri,
Consultant Physician,
Mumbai, India.
Blog: ANIRBANSPEAK
http://anirbanspeak.blogspot.com
--------------------------------------------------------
"Whatever I did, I did it my way.."
No comments:
Post a Comment